Coronavirus has changed the way we travel - with public transport capacity restricted more people are considering active travel options. We've put together some handy FAQs to help you incorporate active travel into your day.
Q - How can I find walking routes without air & noise pollution?
A - The Go Jauntly App has teamed up with environmental researchers Tranquil City to suggest walking routes which are exposed to less air & noise pollution, and which include more green space. Central London Footways also provides a map of quiet and interesting walking routes between major landmarks in London, including train stations, popular destinations and green spaces.
Q - I want to start cycling but I'm nervous, what support is available?
A - Free cycle training is available for cyclists of all abilities. TFL's online Cycle Skills course offers four short modules with tips & advice to get you going. There's also free (in person) cycling courses offered in each borough. Bankside Bike Train offers a free, guided bike rides from Clapham Junction to Bankside (plus a couple of other routes). Check out these tips for cycling safely in London.
Q - I have limited mobility, is there any specific support to help me start cycling?
The Wheels for Wellbeing organisation is set up to remove barriers to cycling. They have a fleet of inclusive bikes which people can try out at inclusive cycling sessions. They offer independent advice to help find a cycling solution that works for you.
Q - I want to walk between stations to avoid taking the tube, but how long will the journey take me?
A - TFL have put together a handy `walking time between stations' map, so that you can check how long it will take you to replace a tube journey with walking.
Q - I don't own a bike, can I still cycle in London?
A - There are over 11,500 bicycles which can be hired at 750 docking stations across London. Find your nearest docking station here. The Santander cycle app can make it easier to find a docking station and hire a bike.
Q - I need to use public transport, what's the best time to travel?
A - Generally the quiet times to travel on public transport are 8:15 - 16:00 and after 17:30 on weekdays, and before noon and after 18:00 on weekends. This varies between stations though - you can check quiet times for a specific station here.
Q - I want to cycle for part of my journey, can I carry my bike on public transport the rest of the way?
A - Folded cycles can be taken on public transport services at all times (although on buses drivers can refuse entry if the bus is too busy). Non-folded cycles can be taken on some services at specific times - check your journey here. We've put together a summary of when non-folding bikes can be taken on trains from Merton here.
Q - How do I keep my bike safe in London?
A - The Met has put together advice on how to keep your bike safe from thieves. There are also some useful tips on how to keep your bike clean, how to repair a puncture, and what to do if you run into a mechanical problem while out on your ride.
Q - Are there any good courses to help my children learn to cycle safely?
A - The Pedal Project has been recommended to us!
A no-nonsense anti-littering campaign will be trialled in Merton following a proposal by Cllr Paul Kohler. It aims to tackle an increase in littering in the borough as lockdown restrictions have eased.
Anti-littering signs will carry robust messaging similar to that used in a successful campaign led by York’s Lib Dem Council (see right). The trial will run in Trinity ward after Cllr Kohler secured cross-party support from his fellow ward councillors from the Conservative Party, and Merton’s Labour-led council.
Cllr Kohler said:
"The easing of the lockdown has led to an increasing amount of litter in our streets and open spaces. A small minority of thoughtless people need to think about the consequences of their actions and I am convinced these signs will help.
“Reducing litter should not be a party political issue and I would like to thank the Labour administration and my fellow Tory councillors for agreeing to this Lib Dem initiative."
The council is now preparing to print the signs and display them across Trinity and if effective, a decision will then be made on whether to roll them out across the borough.
The trial is the latest initiative from Merton Lib Dems’ ‘Cleaner, safer streets’ campaign which has recently seen the local party challenge Merton Council to urgently review the contract it holds with waste contract Veolia after repeated failings.
For more information on the anti-littering trial, or to report litter problems in their area, residents can contact [email protected].
The Government has recently stated it “expects local authorities to make significant changes to their road layouts to give more space to cyclists and pedestrians”, as one way of enabling people to travel safely whilst observing social distancing rules - as an alternative to cars and public transport.
As part of this, Merton Council plans to introduce a `school streets’ for a number of streets in the borough. The objective is to deter car trips for `the school run’. This is achieved by restricting motorised traffic during the morning and afternoon peak periods (for most schools this will be 8:30-9:15am and 3:00-3:45pm).
As well as protecting cyclists and pedestrians, the proposed changes are intended to reduce air pollution around schools, improving children's health.
Signs advising of the restriction period will be erected. The restriction will be enforced by traffic cameras.
During these periods the roads will be predominantly pedestrian and cycle only zones. However, residents who live on the roads, as well as teachers and those with disabilities will be able to apply for an exemption from the Council.
This is initially being introduced as a temporary measure for a maximum of 18 months. During this time there will be a formal consultation process to allow residents to submit comments about the restrictions. Details of the consultation process will be communicated to residents by the Council.
Within 18 months of the restrictions being introduced, the Council will make a final decision which could include ending the scheme, modifying it, or making it permanent.
London Liberal Democrats are carrying out a survey of what steps councils across London have taken, and whether residents support the changes. You can complete the survey online.
A meeting of Merton council last month passed a Merton Liberal Democrat motion to cut engine idling to promote cleaner air.
The Liberal Democrat motion, which was passed unanimously, aims to improve air quality in the borough by introducing `No Idling' zones, particularly near schools.
Speaking after the meeting, Liberal Democrat Cllr Paul Kohler, said:
"Cutting air pollution is a public health issue, as well as an environmental one. Evidence shows that air pollution has links to various health conditions, and shorter life expectancy. That's why we must improve air quality in the borough, particularly round local schools.
"I'm delighted that our motion passed with cross-party support, and I look forward to Merton Council taking real action against idling to improve air quality."
A cross-party committee of councillors has blocked Labour’s plans to hike parking charges by up to 130% due to the Council’s failure to follow proper equalities procedures.
Wednesday evening’s special meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Commission was arranged after the Lib Dem and the Conservative groups each submitted separate motions to ‘call in’ the Council’s proposals to raise the costs of parking permits in Wimbledon and Raynes Park.
During the crunch meeting Cllr Anthony Fairclough, proposer of the Lib Dem call-in, challenged the plan for its failure to follow the Council’s set equality assessment process. The Council’s analysis of the plan identified potential disproportionate impacts on people with disabilities, pregnant women and women who’ve just given birth, as well as some people on low incomes.
In his submission, Cllr Fairclough showed that the Council had failed to consult people from the relevant groups appropriately over ways to minimise any negative impacts - contrary to the Council's published process. He also challenged the Council over the total lack of evidence to support claims that the charges would lead to a reduction in car ownership, and thereby improve air quality:
“When considering groups protected by our equality laws, the relevant principle is ‘no decision about us, without us’.
“That clearly did not happen here. I am pleased that councillors from all parties on the Commission were able to hold the Council to account for failing to follow its equality process.”
The Commission voted to refer the proposal back to the Council cabinet to carry out a proper equality assessment. The Liberal Democrat call-in can be seen on Youtube here.
A formal challenge to Merton Labour’s plans to massively increase parking charges based on where people live has been lodged by Lib Dem councillors.
The Council Cabinet forced agreed the plan at its meeting on 15 July 2019, and in response, an application to “call in” the decision was made by the Liberal Democrat group on Saturday 20th July.
Lib Dem council group leader Anthony Fairclough said:
“The Labour administration says these new charges will reduce traffic and encourage people to give up their cars, but they’ve repeatedly failed to provide any evidence that suggests this is likely to happen1.
“The scheme looks like it’s purely to raise revenue, mainly targeted at people who live in areas that don’t elect Labour councillors – Wimbledon and Raynes Park – where the new charges will be highest. We hope that the ‘call-in’ will force them to look at their plans again.
"Instead we want them to look seriously at schemes where the worst polluting vehicles pay more, where support is given to help people change to greener vehicles, and where other positive action is also taken to improve air quality."
In addition, Lib Dem parliamentary candidate for Wimbledon, Cllr Paul Kohler, is speaking to lawyers from the same firm who represented him in his legal action to save Wimbledon Police Station, about whether the measures are legal.
“Facts matter: how can Labour say that raising taxes on parked cars will improve air quality and health outcomes when council officers have confirmed that no such evidence has been provided?
“Furthermore, Council officers indicated that some older and disabled people, women who are pregnant or who have just given birth, and those with lower incomes could be badly affected by the policy2, and yet there doesn’t seem to have been any real consultation with those affected about how to reduce the negative impact. This is basic equality law.
“I am currently consulting my lawyers to see whether we can challenge this policy in the courts as discriminatory. I took the Mayor of London to court to reverse his unlawful decision to close Wimbledon Police Station and I’m quite willing to do the same with Merton Council if solicitors confirm we have a good case.”
“I hope sense will prevail, as I have no wish to embroil our Council in legal action. All I am asking is that they adopt a non-discriminatory approach to addressing the very real financial pressures caused by the Government’s failure to fund local government properly.
“The decision lacks: evidence that it will improve air quality; logic - they are increasing costs in those areas where air quality is best; principle - they are only applying it to areas that tend not to vote Labour; and buy-in - with over 3000 submissions to the consultation3 nearly all of whom opposed the measures.”
Please find the response of Merton Liberal Democrats and the Liberal Democrat Council group on Merton Council below.
In addition, we would like to submit the (currently) 1092-strong petition stating “We, the undersigned, call on Merton to scrap its plan to double parking charges in Wimbledon and Raynes Park. Any replacement scheme should be based on clear evidence that it will improve air quality, and not unproven assertions” attached.
We believe Merton Council should scrap its plans to massively increase parking charges based on where people live. We believe it should instead bring forward proposals for parking charges based on emissions, testing and shaping these proposals using evidence from its planned review of the diesel levy and emissions based charges (expediting that review if necessary), and learning lessons from similar schemes adopted by other London Boroughs. For us, a key factor is providing real, practical help to enable residents to switch to greener transport options.
Please find our responses to the set questions below.
Last night (6 Feb) there was an extraordinary meeting of Merton Council to discuss the Council's waste contractor, Veolia.
The Liberal Democrat group opposed a Conservative proposal to wait until 2024 and then just swap to another contractor. Liberal Democrat councillors instead put forward an amendment demanding that Merton Council, together with the South London Waste Partnership, immediately review its processes in managing and monitoring waste management services - so that lessons could be learned.
[You can watch the debate on Youtube here]
After debate, the Liberal Democrat amendment was ultimately supported by Conservative councillors. But despite this, it was blocked by Labour Council bosses who shockingly claimed there were no problems.
Speaking after the meeting, the leader of the Lib Dem group, Cllr Anthony Fairclough said:
"I was surprised that the Conservatives were willing to let the current situation continue for another 5 years, while we waited for an opportunity to try to end Veolia's contract and swap contractors.
"The Liberal Democrats on the Council want to see real action now. That's why we’re demanding an immediate review of how Merton could better manage waste and recycling contracts - whether the contractor is Veolia or another company in the future - to keep our borough clean and the bins emptied.
"We need to look and learn what works - Merton must get better at being a Council that commissions services, rather than one that provides services directly.
"I'm pleased we won over the Conservatives to our way of thinking on this in the end. But it's frankly extraordinary that Labour councillors are unwilling to consider new ways of tackling the problem!"
Labour council bosses determined to press ahead with new parking scheme.
At a meeting of Merton Council focusing on air quality, Liberal Democrats councillors called on the Council to scrap their plans to massively increase parking charges based on where you live, and instead move towards an emissions based scheme where the worst polluting vehicles pay more.
The plan was voted down by Labour councillors. [You can see the debate here on Youtube]
An analysis by Merton Lib Dems has shown that the proposed new charges for residents parking permits will mainly affect areas without Labour councillors. The increases will raise £1.4m a year, over £1m (70%) of which will be paid by people in Wimbledon, £172k from Raynes park but only £72k (5%) from the whole of Mitcham and Morden.
Lib Dem Cllr Simon McGrath said:
“Labour Council bosses have provided no evidence that their plan to increase parking charges will reduce traffic. The scheme looks like it’s purely to raise revenue, targeted at people who live in areas that don’t elect Labour councillors.”
Please sign our petition here: http://www.mertonlibdems.org.uk/parkingcharges
Lib Dem Cllr Eloise Bailey also proposed the appointment of a new Air quality Scrutiny Champion, to ensure a focus on effective action to cut air pollution. This was also blocked by Labour councillors. [You can see the debate here on Youtube]
Speaking after the meeting Cllr Bailey said:
“I'm so disappointed. Poor air quality is a huge health issue, and our idea was to try to get a real focus on air quality in the Council’s work, and get effective action.”